Profiles - Gender
- steamboat28
- Offline
- Banned
- Si vis pacem, para bellum.
A.Div
IP | Apprentice | Seminary | Degree
AMA | Vlog | Meditation
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Gender is a metric that identifies significantly less people than Sex.
Convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- steamboat28
- Offline
- Banned
- Si vis pacem, para bellum.
Care to quote a statistic on that, or are we going on your traditional ultra-conservative, "everybody but me is wrong", ostrich-head-in-the-socio-political-sand ramblings here?ren wrote: Gender is a metric that identifies significantly less people than Sex.
A.Div
IP | Apprentice | Seminary | Degree
AMA | Vlog | Meditation
Please Log in to join the conversation.
steamboat28 wrote:
Care to quote a statistic on that, or are we going on your traditional ultra-conservative, "everybody but me is wrong", ostrich-head-in-the-socio-political-sand ramblings here?ren wrote: Gender is a metric that identifies significantly less people than Sex.
there is no statistic for that, statistics do not measure things which do not exist. I see you once again show absolute ignorance of other cultures on this topic. You used to be a decent guy, what happened?
Convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- steamboat28
- Offline
- Banned
- Si vis pacem, para bellum.
ren wrote: there is no statistic for that, statistics do not measure things which do not exist. I see you once again show absolute ignorance of other cultures on this topic. You used to be a decent guy, what happened?
Gender exists as a concept. It has for a very long time. It is such an old concept that it has been traditionally subverted by shaman and medicine workers for the whole of recorded history.
Would you, having that knowledge, like to present me with evidence from a sociologist or anthropologist that says otherwise? Because if not, you're talking out of your ass to push your own opinion.
Part of the message is hidden for the guests. Please log in or register to see it.
A.Div
IP | Apprentice | Seminary | Degree
AMA | Vlog | Meditation
Please Log in to join the conversation.
It won't let me have a blank signature ...
Please Log in to join the conversation.
It was taken elsewhere, now everyone is just carrying on the debate in two places :laugh:
If you've got no interest in reading through all the diatribe (I don't blame you)
It was Changed to
Sex: Male, Female, Neither.
Then back to
Gender: Male, Female, Non-Entry.
So, twelve hours of chest puffing and debate...and we're back where we started
Come back in another day, and it may or may not be a different story
Please Log in to join the conversation.
steamboat28 wrote:
ren wrote: there is no statistic for that, statistics do not measure things which do not exist. I see you once again show absolute ignorance of other cultures on this topic. You used to be a decent guy, what happened?
Gender exists as a concept. It has for a very long time. It is such an old concept that it has been traditionally subverted by shaman and medicine workers for the whole of recorded history.
Would you, having that knowledge, like to present me with evidence from a sociologist or anthropologist that says otherwise? Because if not, you're talking out of your ass to push your own opinion.
Part of the message is hidden for the guests. Please log in or register to see it.
Ah personal attacks.
First of all "sex" exists all over the world. "gender" does not exist all over the world. You have been told this a dozen times now by myself and other members. It is not about how old "gender" is, but if you must mention age know this: "sex" also existed long before any ideas of anything, let alone "gender" did, around 1.2 billion years ago? I don't think they had shamans 1.2 billion years ago. But you can supply evidence from a sociologist or anthropologist that says otherwise if it makes you happy.
I incidentally recall being told that two-spirits is not the same as gender. You may very well be offending native-americans with your statements.
Secondly. You have witnessed no such things from me.
I do not believe that whatever groups I belong to are better, because don't like what comes with groups and refrain from joiing them. 10 years of totjo, I wrote half the doctrine and you don't wonder why I'm just a member? Are you just having a laugh with this?
You have most certainly not witnessed racism from me as my wife and children are not "my race", and I get along with people from other cultures --just not yours--, unfortunately we're the same race, so that still doesn't count as racism. Better luck next time
You have not witnessed sexism from me as I have a son and daughter, and I don't want them to be discriminated against or turned rotten by feminists, an issue most people here know concerns me greatly.
I'm also not an "ableist". You see my son has a mental illness, another thing I have not kept secret here, and particularly concerned about his rights. What can I say I'm a libertarian. I also remember having to defend people with symptoms I am familiar with here, from you and your bully friends.
I have no idea where the homophobia comment comes from, as I've got good relationships with homosexuals on and off totjo, including a physical one which I have spoken about before, here at totjo.
As to the transphobic comment, I do not see how sex is transphobic. I do not see how giving an option other than "male" and "female" is transphobic.
Now that everything is back as it was, surely you can calm down?
Convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies.
Please Log in to join the conversation.