- Posts: 8163
Jedi Healers
Modern medicine has its use but medication is giving out a bit too much by dr which is why we have so many drug addicts. I am not talking about the street junkies I am talking about the high fuctioning pill poppers who take 5 to 7 medications per day.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Whatever works in the end.
Some people, Reiki.
Others, Medicine.
Still others, both.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
My first questions to him were about diet and lifestyle (a usual line of questioning in Chinese and complementary medicine). I think drinking 4 litres of cola a day, eating processed food all the time, getting little to no exercise, and spending most of his spare time watching TV might have a lot to do with it. But he insists on popping the pills because "the Doctor told me to so it must be right".
Any healer worth his salt, and that includes doctors, would have found out about these factors in his life and encouraged him to try some changes and see if they worked - like getting out more, consuming less sugar, etc - before resorting to dismissing his problems with a every-expanding range of medication.
Now I'm not saying that all doctors are like that, but it's just one example of how practitioners of supposedly respectable and verifiable science can still fail.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I've come to believe, as a Jedi healer, we are here not just to heal bodies, but minds and spirits as well.
rugadd
rugadd
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Mark Anjuu wrote: Considering the amount of "acceptable" side effects listed for most modern medicines that have passed such rigorous testing, I fail to see how anything can be considered as suitable. A few years ago I was prescribed a common anti-inflammatory that was mass produced, regulated and approved and yet listed such potential side effects as "blindness, paralysis and death". In that regard, no medicine is safe!
A side effect of life is death... Drugs come with all the necessary warnings because a: it's the law and b: they dont want to get sued. When I was a teenager I couldn't get medicine for my skin (I have very bad skin) because I was doing a lot of sport, and the medicine caused a .00001% increase in heart failure rates. On the other hand you don't see "gives cancer" on bottles of clove oil, even though its cytotoxicity is well known. It is my opinion that all forms of medical practice should be regulated by the same laws. Whether it's the local herbs shop, the pharmacy, a GP or a reiki practitioner. You want to give medical advice? either get a phd in giving medical advice or shut it.
Yes and no. If people can choose to be a threat to me by carrying disease, I want to have the right to be a threat to them through bearing arms. The #1 reason for free healthcare is that if the rich pay for the poor, then the poor will not be transmitting their diseases to the rich. Serious diseases were eliminated in europe through mass vaccination. Now that we dont vaccinate ourselves against those diseases anymore, they're getting back in through immigration and aids. I'd like to add, in my country, words/ideas like "adult" or "free" are often replaced with "majeur et vacciné" (meaning major --as opposed to minor-- and vaccinated). We are also obliged by law to vaccinate against Poliomyelitis, Tetanus and Diphtheria. Also in some areas against yellow fever too. Then there's lots of vaccines that are recommended... stuff like hepatitis, HPV, etc...Everyone has the right to choose their own methods of healthcare. Forcing someone to undergo complementary therapy against their will would be just as immoral as forcing drugs onto people that don't want them. If you don't believe that a particular approach works, then don't use it. It's really that simple.
Convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
ren wrote:
Mark Anjuu wrote: Considering the amount of "acceptable" side effects listed for most modern medicines that have passed such rigorous testing, I fail to see how anything can be considered as suitable. A few years ago I was prescribed a common anti-inflammatory that was mass produced, regulated and approved and yet listed such potential side effects as "blindness, paralysis and death". In that regard, no medicine is safe!
A side effect of life is death... Drugs come with all the necessary warnings because a: it's the law and b: they dont want to get sued. When I was a teenager I couldn't get medicine for my skin (I have very bad skin) because I was doing a lot of sport, and the medicine caused a .00001% increase in heart failure rates. On the other hand you don't see "gives cancer" on bottles of clove oil, even though its cytotoxicity is well known. It is my opinion that all forms of medical practice should be regulated by the same laws. Whether it's the local herbs shop, the pharmacy, a GP or a reiki practitioner. You want to give medical advice? either get a phd in giving medical advice or shut it.
Yes and no. If people can choose to be a threat to me by carrying disease, I want to have the right to be a threat to them through bearing arms. The #1 reason for free healthcare is that if the rich pay for the poor, then the poor will not be transmitting their diseases to the rich. Serious diseases were eliminated in europe through mass vaccination. Now that we dont vaccinate ourselves against those diseases anymore, they're getting back in through immigration and aids. I'd like to add, in my country, words/ideas like "adult" or "free" are often replaced with "majeur et vacciné" (meaning major --as opposed to minor-- and vaccinated). We are also obliged by law to vaccinate against Poliomyelitis, Tetanus and Diphtheria. Also in some areas against yellow fever too. Then there's lots of vaccines that are recommended... stuff like hepatitis, HPV, etc...Everyone has the right to choose their own methods of healthcare. Forcing someone to undergo complementary therapy against their will would be just as immoral as forcing drugs onto people that don't want them. If you don't believe that a particular approach works, then don't use it. It's really that simple.
Ah, so If someone suffers from a disease such as anger say... you should take up arms against them?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Tell the psychiatric services that. and also just about every religios person going. Most psychiatric services are adamant that anger is a "problem that needs to be managed"... buhdism defins it as "A deluded mind that focuses on an animate or inanimate object, feels it to be unatractive, exaggerates it's bad qualities, and wishes to harm it" So are you sure that it's not a bit dangerous?...I'm not sure about the Jedi view on anger. Although I did see a film about it once...ren wrote: Not a disease, also, unlikely to harm me.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies.
Please Log in to join the conversation.