Hey! Let's Open The Vaccination Can Of Worms!

  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
05 Feb 2015 20:45 #180378 by
The distinction here is that everyone seems to agree that drunk driving is bad because it kills people, but that same connection is not being made in the case of vaccination, or lack thereof.

Over 100 measles cases have been traced back to ONE DAY at Disneyland. Those cases are now all over the state of California in just under 2 months time. Some of these cases are people who were not vaccinated, one of which was a toddler who brought it to her preschool the following week. There are also cases of children who would've been vaccinated according to their parent's wishes, but were not old enough yet. These babies never had a chance.

As to the number of deaths attributed to anti-vaxxers, that will never be a fair comparison to drunk driving deaths. It takes a single drunk driver in a vehicle to kill people in another vehicle. They have to be on a highway or road. The potential victims may have an opportunity to see it coming and avoid the accident. It requires a very specific set of circumstances, and because vehicles are involved, it most often affects 5 or 6 victims at most. It is highly unlikely that a drunk driver will kill me on an escalator in a shopping mall. However, one person carrying Measles could be responsible for infecting hundreds of people who are never even in contact with them in any number of environments. A cough can leave the measles in the air and on surfaces that others come into contact with hours later. The Disneyland example has shown that the virus remains alive and spreadable hours after the original carrier has gone. And then some of these people got onto airplanes! I imagine most people thought the Black Plague wasn't so bad when it only affected 100 or so people.

I'm not advocating a police state here, but I would like the people choosing not to vaccinate themselves or their children to accept that they are putting others at risk whether they intend to or not. This fact is scientifically proven , and we are witnessing it in action right now. At what point do the risks to the public outweigh any perceived benefit of opting out of vaccinations that has yet to be proven?
The topic has been locked.
More
05 Feb 2015 20:46 #180379 by RosalynJ

elizabeth wrote: Just because people choose to say no to vaccination is not an indicator of wether they care about others..
It is a right to choose..
Many intelligent caring people make this choice, they are not idiots, they DO there research and base their choice on that.
Just because it doesn't fall in line with what you believe doesn't make it wrong!!!


I can agree with some sentiments here, particularly the last part. One must wonder (and this is on both sides) where people are getting their information from. That'll make all the difference in the world as to whether someone is on one side or the other.

Pax Per Ministerium
[img



The topic has been locked.
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
05 Feb 2015 20:46 #180380 by

steamboat28 wrote:

Warning: Spoiler!


I sincerely sympothise with your situation Steam. I can't pretend to understand that. I also know that I will do anything I can to protect my family. I also thank you for the link.

However, I will still disagree with the need to mandate vaccinations, though every one really, really should get vaccinated.

To me it's like smoking cigarettes. (an analogy I'm surprised it took me this long to come up with). I don't smoke, I don't like the fact that other people smoke. I don't like the fact that there is smoke in the air outside both entrances to my job and usually outside my apartment. That does effect my health. I still won't agree to make it illegal, though I enjoy going places where you're not allowed to smoke.

This will probably be my last post on the subject barring exciting new information. Though I will continue to watch with interest. :)
The topic has been locked.
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
05 Feb 2015 20:50 #180381 by
Perhaps I'm pouring gas on a fire here, but this flow chart did make me laugh :laugh: :evil:

The topic has been locked.
More
05 Feb 2015 20:52 #180382 by steamboat28

elizabeth wrote: ...they DO there research...


What research would that be?

What peer-reviewed evidence do they have that rivals the 107 studies that show vaccines aren't linked to autism, or the numerous studies ( here are just a few ) that vaccines are perfectly safe?

What university did their degrees come from? How many lab hours have they logged? What positions did they hold in the medical field? Did they work for the CDC or the WHO? What are their credentials?

Because if they don't have any, their research amounts to nil in the face of an entire globe's worth of health professionals who have studied this since 1796.

Google is not a science class. Bing doesn't offer medical degrees. Stop pretending that armchair enthusiasm is "research."
The topic has been locked.
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
05 Feb 2015 20:52 - 05 Feb 2015 20:55 #180383 by
I don't think coercing people to vaccinate is the right solution. I think that every business, organization, and institution should be allowed to refuse entry and services on the premises of a person's vaccination status. Ideally, I would like it to be such that people who don't get vaccines would be social outcasts forced to live outside of the public's central places (they can start their own version of a leper colony). Infecting someone with a preventable disease should be considered assault by negligence and if they die, homicidal negligence.

For me this isn't just a mental exercise, a medical debate, or a libertarian fantasy; for me this is personal. I have friends who would die if they were exposed to these preventable diseases. My friends rely on the fact that vaccination is almost a given, but now that anti-vaxxing has become a fad, my friends have to be more cautious (none of them are going to Disney any time soon). Furthermore, I think we need to challenge this attitude about neurodivergence that disturbs me. Let's pretend that some incredibly small fraction of the population who receives vaccinations were to get autism because of it. Is autism such a horrible thing that we would rather risk our children dying than have an autistic child? The anti-vax rhetoric is awful from start to finish, incredibly misinformed and I think that the higher-ups in this movement should be put on charges for inciting the public to mass hysteria and willful ignorance leading to the death and infection of hundreds (if not thousands) of people.

Also to Steamboat's well-sourced argument <3.
Last edit: 05 Feb 2015 20:55 by .
The topic has been locked.
More
05 Feb 2015 21:00 #180384 by Kit
Goken, the numbers aren't there yet because the older generations understood what a godsend (if you'll excuse the word :) )vaccinations are. They lived through those diseases. They know the pain and suffering they cause. So most of my generation was vaccinated. It's only more recently become the 'cool' thing to not vaccinate due to wishy-washy excuses (I say wishy-washy because I have yet to see a reason that vaccinations are more harmful than helpful and backed by scientific studies) so more kids are not vaccinated which drops the overall percentage of herd vaccinations which cause those people who CAN'T get vaccinations to become susceptible to those preventable diseases. We have forgotten how horrible these diseases are. They're not just a cold, you feel bad for a week, and yay all better! There is a chance (and a high enough one to be scary) that you come out physically or mentally disabled, or die. If that's something you can prevent for extremely low risk, wouldn't you?

Read Roald Dahl's Powerful Pro-Vaccination Letter (From 1988)

Another problem is anti-vaxxers seem to flock together. So that's an even more concentrated location of lack of vaccinations. This report also shows the cases of measles. http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2015/01/20/378630798/parents-who-shun-vaccines-tend-to-cluster-boosting-childrens-risk (this is the article that has the towns near me on the list *shudder*

And the scary thing about measles is how quickly it spreads. You can spread it before the rash shows up, and if you cough in a room and wander out, anybody who walks in that room WITHIN TWO HOURS can contract the measles from you.

More reading: Vaccine Refusal Has Helped Drive U.S. Measles Cases To A 20-Year High

Driving drunk is just as selfish and as much of a public hazard as not getting vaccinations. It's not just you that you're affecting, you're putting the rest of the community at risk as well. That's why I vilify those who don't vaccinate as badly as those who drive drunk. Their personal choice has a high probability of badly affecting the lives of those around them.

Zenchi found the cure!! You have to submit a vaccination record in order to get electricity!
The following user(s) said Thank You: steamboat28, ,
The topic has been locked.
More
05 Feb 2015 21:05 #180385 by Amaya
Whow great attitude Jamie...
yeah make them social outcasts.. Lets do that!!!

In fact while we are at it lets throw everyone out that doesn't agree with our narrow minded view of them... Boy that will help things...
And armchair enthusiasts.. Really? Okay fine

I stand by my choices and they are MY choices

Everything is belief
The following user(s) said Thank You: Alethea Thompson
The topic has been locked.
More
05 Feb 2015 21:07 #180386 by Kit

elizabeth wrote: Just because people choose to say no to vaccination is not an indicator of wether they care about others..
It is a right to choose..
Many intelligent caring people make this choice, they are not idiots, they DO there research and base their choice on that.
Just because it doesn't fall in line with what you believe doesn't make it wrong!!!


If a person wants to believe in gods, ghosts, or aliens, that does not affect anyone else and more power to them.

If a person decides not to vaccinate, they put the lives of the people around them at risk. How isn't that an indicator of whether or not they care about others?

Again, if there were some scientific evidence to back the anti-vaxxers arguments, I would be more ok with a personal choice, but with the overwhelming evidence in support of vaccinating and the massive harm it can cause other people, there shouldn't be a question.

I'm still waiting on scientifically backed evidence from the anti-vaxxer side.
The following user(s) said Thank You: steamboat28
The topic has been locked.
More
05 Feb 2015 21:08 - 05 Feb 2015 21:10 #180387 by steamboat28
I'm still a fan of the idea of doctors and pediatrician's offices refusing service to the willfully unvaccinated during normal business hours because it poses such a threat to the immunocompromised patients.

Also, can we just talk about this list for a moment?
Warning: Spoiler!
Last edit: 05 Feb 2015 21:10 by steamboat28.
The topic has been locked.
Moderators: ZeroMorkanoRiniTaviKhwang