IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: Initiate Programme Update

A thank you to Arcade for helping me proof read it all

This is kind of awesome.

Thank you!

ren wrote: That's because they'd been moved to the personal tools and religion lessons. I find the religion lesson painful to look at.

Which lesson (lesson 6?) and why do you say that ren?

I think under temple doctrine should also include how the council and other parts of totjo work. Perhaps as excercise 6? Just my opioin

Akkarin wrote:

ren wrote: That's because they'd been moved to the personal tools and religion lessons. I find the religion lesson painful to look at.

Which lesson (lesson 6?) and why do you say that ren?

the essay about swords or lightsabers and whatnot had been turned into symbolism exercise in religion lesson.
(anti)thesis/Synthesis had been moved to a fourth exercise in personal tools.

I say that because I had put quite a lot of thought into the religion lesson to make it bigger (more exploration needed) and more free (exploring concepts found in religions, not specific religions). Your changes look rushed, and I find the whole thing butchered.

Its a work in progress, like life itself. Its received quite a bit of positive feedback so far....

Zenchi wrote: Its a work in progress, like life itself.

+1

ren wrote:

Akkarin wrote:

ren wrote: That's because they'd been moved to the personal tools and religion lessons. I find the religion lesson painful to look at.

Which lesson (lesson 6?) and why do you say that ren?

the essay about swords or lightsabers and whatnot had been turned into symbolism exercise in religion lesson.
(anti)thesis/Synthesis had been moved to a fourth exercise in personal tools.

I say that because I had put quite a lot of thought into the religion lesson to make it bigger (more exploration needed) and more free (exploring concepts found in religions, not specific religions). Your changes look rushed, and I find the whole thing butchered.

Bon apres-midi, Ren!

I didn't realise you were active once more! I am glad to see you still contributing.

Zenchi wrote: Its a work in progress, like life itself. Its received quite a bit of positive feedback so far....

And I am glad people like the structure. What saddens me is to see my work reduced in quality instead of improved. I mean, even the bonus exercises are gone? No more krishnamurti, no more carl sagan? What's the point of changing nothing except the structure?

ren wrote:

Zenchi wrote: Its a work in progress, like life itself. Its received quite a bit of positive feedback so far....

And I am glad people like the structure. What saddens me is to see my work reduced in quality instead of improved. I mean, even the bonus exercises are gone? No more krishnamurti, no more carl sagan? What's the point of changing nothing except the structure?

lol, did you ever work on the Council ren?

What is easier to do? Changes step by step, or 10 changes all in one go. Each piece of material is discussed and agreed upon before anything is implemented, so we can either wait several months to discuss each thing or we can make this change and then discuss new material separately.

I could have just put everything you had on there straight into the IP and then it would have been removed (probably by Jestor ), because I have no right or authority to do so.

How much bitching was there when I re-did the entire FaQ in a single go? (because I rewrote so much they didn't have time to properly check it all) Jestor even brought that up and reminded me how things are better done step by step...