don't the let sith invade us

PatrickB wrote: You see jedi knight identifies them self as protector of the peace.And the sith to killer of the war they are warrior do you see that distinction adder

I read what you wrote, but disagree with your interpretation, as outlined in my previous post but also because protector/guardian denotes the external interaction whilst warrior can safely and easily describe the internal focus ie; inner warrior. To your position though, I'd argue that the dark side enables that which it so dramatically represented in the fiction, but does not necessitate it. Therefore the practise becomes perhaps risky, but not inherently evil. The individual is responsible for their actions, society has no place for that fictional antagonism and this is not a role playing site/community. So as others have said it seems more accurate to judge the individual, and I'd be careful about using blanket labels to focus negative emotions, as that is a type of dark empowerment in itself (imo).

I Have read that a jedi rouge is consider as a stih inquisitor is that true for you . and night is there to rest your body and the crop refresh them self and sand is the essential of the earth heat for instance there the dark who mean criminal and the temp to be obscure of the force i don't consider night or black colour obscure of the force. May the light side of the force be with you always i like to have a commentary on this, can you give me the insights on a jedi rouge or fallen .
Ryujin

It seems that you are still going more on the fiction than the reality. First of all, you can't always believe what you see online. You can find a site for Sith that may be more grounded in the fictional aspects. They may be role players who don't admit to role playing and do it subtly. And then you may come across those who are merely joking around...trolling if you will.

To be a Sith does not mean you are focused on evil...on crime...on destruction...whatever else there is. This is the fictional interpretation of the Sith. However, just like in the Jedi community, you will find those who take things a bit too far. And this is why you can't judge the Sith as a whole. There are people who look at us Jedi and see a bunch of nerds wielding plastic lightsabers and wearing robes all the time. What you're doing to the Sith is what "outsiders" do to the Jedi community. Make accusations...stereotype.

Now, a lot of Jedi I have met do not use the different Jedi and Sith labels (protector, healer, warrior, inquisitor, etc etc) mostly because those are labels for the fictional aspects of the two groups. Some Jedi and Sith will use these labels to better define what their intentions are, but most won't go walking around saying "I'm a Jedi protector" or "I'm a Sith inquisitor" or what have you. As I said, it's because these labels are more for the fictional aspects.

Much like the labels listed above, you will also see things like "light jedi", "grey jedi", "dark jedi" and so on. Once again, these are used more for showing people the path you follow, and not really as labels like in fiction. You will also find that with these labels come different interpretations as to what each one means. That's the great thing about Jediism and Sithism...there is no set definition for anything. You make of it what you want. You get to define yourself. You can throw a label out there to help people figure out who you are, but most know that it's just a tool, and not an actual label. That's how I see it, at least. I've been here for 6 months now, and I have yet to use any of these labels (at least not to my knowledge) because I don't want to people to make judgement based off of the fictional aspects of those labels.

Now, I will be honest and tell you that my reply is coming off of most other people's replies, because most of the time I really can't understand a thing you're saying, lol. I'm not picking on you or being mean, because I know this isn't your first language and that you are learning, i'm just letting you know where my reply is coming from. So if I ever hit on something you that didn't really say, I apologize in advance I've never been good when it comes to understanding broken English...which is terrible because that's all I hear at my job (that's what you get for living near the border of Mexico, lol).

when i say rogue, i mean it in the generic sense of the word...i'm not a bad or evil person, but not everything i do is considered good/legal etc...i will do whatever is needed, even if it means breaking a rule or two as long as its outcome and intention is for a good cause...i will not do something for greedy or selfish reasons, unless it benefits others as well...i walk the line between, if i have to break a few eggs so be it....but i also have my own lines that i will not cross....i have no problem accepting the consequences for my actions good or bad....humans are too complex to pigeon hole into simply light or dark...there is a very large grey area that most people live in....

When I say Rogue I'm talking about D&D or WoW.

I have seen class-based titles here though. Can anyone PM me the significance as far as the Realist Order goes?

PatrickB wrote: I hi williamkeade I am composing in English all right and i am not arguing with anybody and it's true my education is french speaking and i practice two languages how smart is that.

Well... in Europe, isn't bilingual speaking pretty much par for the course? So the only trick then is to become fluent enough to pass for a native English speaker.

Williamkaede wrote: English is regarded as the hardest language in the world to learn isn't it?

I heard that was Icelandic.

English is up there, though. We've got too many linguistic rules and exceptions and junk.

Hadi Apollos wrote: To be a Sith does not mean you are focused on evil...on crime...on destruction...whatever else there is. This is the fictional interpretation of the Sith.

I dunno, I'd say the Sith are more Lawful Evil. They don't really go for the crime stuff. They're more interested in rewriting the laws, THEN doing the bad stuff.

I'm more Chaotic Good, aren't I so damn original.

Chaotic Good

Superb expression....

I hope it's ironic

Williamkaede wrote: When I say Rogue I'm talking about D&D or WoW.

So you do it from behind then?