Hey! Let's Open The Vaccination Can Of Worms!

More
10 Feb 2015 14:28 #180940 by Gisteron
So where is that measurable permanent brain damage most of us should be suffering from?

Better to leave questions unanswered than answers unquestioned
The topic has been locked.
More
10 Feb 2015 14:38 #180941 by Edan
I think the word 'might' in your post red eye show that the conclusion on it hasn't been reached, as Brenna pointed out with the mice.

It won't let me have a blank signature ...
The topic has been locked.
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
10 Feb 2015 14:50 - 10 Feb 2015 14:53 #180943 by

Edan wrote: I think the word 'might' in your post red eye show that the conclusion on it hasn't been reached, as Brenna pointed out with the mice.


You might survive a fall from a skyscraper if you roll yourself in enough bubble wrap, you might not get bone cancer if you eat 500mg of strontium 90 each day for the rest of your life. What we are talking about is one of the most potent neurotoxins ever discovered. We know it is indeed toxic to cultured human brain tissue and lab animals at doses relevant to those infants receive. There is zero doubt it's not a good idea to inject yourself with it.

[hr]

Gisteron wrote: So where is that measurable permanent brain damage most of us should be suffering from?


I am sure we will get in a circular loop here.

If I show you a large group of the population (that is quickly growing), with characteristics consistent with mercury poisoning, it will be written off as there is no definitive link between mercury and that group of people.

It is not enough to show a large percentage of the population affected with ailments that mimic mercury poisoning, it is necessary to prove it.
Last edit: 10 Feb 2015 14:53 by .
The topic has been locked.
More
10 Feb 2015 15:11 #180945 by Gisteron

Red_Eye_Jedi wrote:

Gisteron wrote: So where is that measurable permanent brain damage most of us should be suffering from?


I am sure we will get in a circular loop here.

If I show you a large group of the population (that is quickly growing), with characteristics consistent with mercury poisoning, it will be written off as there is no definitive link between mercury and that group of people.

You should contact the James Randi Educational Foundation because apparently you know more about where I was going than did I... for the second time now, I might add. Anyway, whether you meet their million dollar challenge or not, you don't get to dismiss my inquiry for evidence against Premise 2 by just predicting that I'd be shifting the goal post. You can call me out on it all you like once I do if I do, thank you very much.

It is not enough to show a large percentage of the population affected with ailments that mimic mercury poisoning, it is necessary to prove it.

If you can demonstrate the falsehood of Premise 2, which can be done with showing a mere correlation (because a correlation is the only thing it is denying), my entire argument would collapse. If you want to set your bar higher still, be my guest, but don't accuse me of shifting it until I have.

Better to leave questions unanswered than answers unquestioned
The topic has been locked.
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
10 Feb 2015 15:26 #180947 by

Gisteron wrote: ....


It is not enough to show that 1 in 68 people in the US are afflicted with a disease which shares many characteristics with
Erethism aka mad hatter disease, it is not enough to show that mercury levels in fish are rising, it is not enough to show that rates of this disease are rising.

In short correlation is not causation, and its not something I can make a case for.

All I can make a case for is that mercury in all it's forms is best avoided as it is a proven and potent neurotoxin even at infant vaccine dose levels.

That is all that is being said, and there is no debate as to whether or not that is true. Indeed it is so.

Best wishes on your path friend.
The topic has been locked.
More
10 Feb 2015 15:36 - 10 Feb 2015 15:39 #180948 by Gisteron

Red_Eye_Jedi wrote: It is not enough to show that 1 in 68 people in the US are afflicted with a disease which shares many characteristics with
Erethism aka mad hatter disease, it is not enough to show that mercury levels in fish are rising, it is not enough to show that rates of this disease are rising.

To destroy my argument it is, if you can also show that they are the same people who were vaccinated. Please, do show those things, then we'll have a case on our hands.

That is all that is being said, and there is no debate as to whether or not that is true. Indeed it is so.

Sorry, that's not the evidence. That's the claim.

Better to leave questions unanswered than answers unquestioned
Last edit: 10 Feb 2015 15:39 by Gisteron.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Kit
The topic has been locked.
  • Brenna
  • Offline
  • User
  • User
  • I hear your voice on the wind, and I hear you call out my name
More
10 Feb 2015 21:16 - 10 Feb 2015 21:40 #180979 by Brenna
The diagrams you provided dont disprove anything I had said. We know that mercury is still used in flu vaccines. no one disputed that. Only that its no longer present in the majority of vaccines, particularly the ones that children get.

However.

Fascinated to note on the diagrams that there is actually a vaccine for encephalitis... not something which was available when I was a child. And with a much higher level of mercury than the flu vaccines.

I rang my mother this morning and asked if she would have allowed me to have that vaccine even with its mercury levels. She said yes without any hesitation. Would have been preferable to the 4 weeks I spent in hospital at age 9, multiple lumbar punctures, daily blood tests.... oh yes and the almost dying from it thing.

Not to mention some of the lingering complications that I will always have.

As a side note, did you know that having measles drastically increases your chances of contracting encephalitis?

I may have tried to make this point already, but it seems to have escaped notice. Its a compromise. Accepting a level of risk to avoid a greater level of risk. And well worth it in my opinion.



Walking, stumbling on these shadowfeet

Part of the seduction of most religions is the idea that if you just say the right things and believe really hard, your salvation will be at hand.

With Jediism. No one is coming to save you. You have to get off your ass and do it yourself - Me
Last edit: 10 Feb 2015 21:40 by Brenna.
The following user(s) said Thank You: steamboat28, Edan
The topic has been locked.
  • Brenna
  • Offline
  • User
  • User
  • I hear your voice on the wind, and I hear you call out my name
More
10 Feb 2015 21:53 - 10 Feb 2015 21:55 #180980 by Brenna

Red_Eye_Jedi wrote:

Brenna wrote: then we could have wrapped this up ages ago.


Indeed it has been since page 11 or so.


And yet you're still going?

Red_Eye_Jedi wrote: Picture this, all mercury based preservatives get removed from vaccines, but now by law the doctor has to hit you in the back of the head hard enough to render you unconscious each time you get vaccinated.

But you say, that's absurd how on earth does that even make sense to mandate such absurdity?

Everyone else looks at you as if the question you just asked was outrageous and nonsensical.

"Well that is just the way things are and these vaccines help people, so you gotta take the good with the bad!"

"Quit rocking the boat!" They say. "It's fine. I've been knocked unconscious 82 times and I am still fine."

The situation itself is just as absurd as this one.


erm... this does not an argument make. The mercury was used as a preservative to prevent people from getting secondary infections from multi use vaccine vials. So.... they were trying to help people I guess... somewhat different from a random and arbitrary whack to the back of the head :woohoo:

Red_Eye_Jedi wrote: I am not anti vaccination, I am against shooting yourself up with one of the most potent neurotoxins we know of.
Saying maybe we shouldn't spray our our fruits and vegetables with potent neruotoxins, doesn't mean you are against fruits and vegetables either.


I did not suggest you were. I was steering the subject to what I consider a useful conversation. The ethical (and jedi) considerations of the vaccination discussion.


I am deeply curious now though. How far does this avid concern over neurotoxins go for you. Of the many things (i believe I provided a partial list earlier) that are known neurotoxins that we continue to use anyway, how many do you actively avoid? Apart of course from vaccines and mercury fillings.

And more interestingly, whos responsibility to educate on the facts do you think it is. Supplier? Consumer? Government?



Walking, stumbling on these shadowfeet

Part of the seduction of most religions is the idea that if you just say the right things and believe really hard, your salvation will be at hand.

With Jediism. No one is coming to save you. You have to get off your ass and do it yourself - Me
Last edit: 10 Feb 2015 21:55 by Brenna.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Edan
The topic has been locked.
  • Brenna
  • Offline
  • User
  • User
  • I hear your voice on the wind, and I hear you call out my name
More
11 Feb 2015 08:46 #181022 by Brenna
Aware Im flogging a dead horse, but to circle back to the Jedi element of this discussion, this popped up on my newsfeed a few hours ago.

https://www.facebook.com/jennifer.hibbenwhite/posts/10155168515065632:0

Warning: Spoiler!



Walking, stumbling on these shadowfeet

Part of the seduction of most religions is the idea that if you just say the right things and believe really hard, your salvation will be at hand.

With Jediism. No one is coming to save you. You have to get off your ass and do it yourself - Me
Attachments:
The following user(s) said Thank You: steamboat28, Jestor, RosalynJ, Kit, Edan,
The topic has been locked.
Moderators: ZeroMorkanoRiniTaviKhwang