- Posts: 2134
Copy of Post in the Knight's Forum: Election of Knights as Advisory Council
Br. John wrote: Do y'all want to open the voting now and keep it open for 7 days?
Sounds good.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Second thistzb wrote:
Br. John wrote: Do y'all want to open the voting now and keep it open for 7 days?
Sounds good.
Knight of the Order
Training Master: Jestor
Apprentices: Lama Su, Leah
Just a pop culture Jedi doing what I can
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Thank you, Br. John for clarifying that we can settle the term limits issue as a first act of business for the newly formed group.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- steamboat28
- Offline
- User
- Si vis pacem, para bellum.
A.Div
IP | Apprentice | Seminary | Degree
AMA | Vlog | Meditation
Please Log in to join the conversation.
steamboat28 wrote: Can I be "that guy" and ask that the Apprentice position be voted on by mostly, if not only, apprentices? If they're going to have an official advisory voice, I'd love for them to be able to choose it themselves.
Personally speaking, I'm looking forward to voting on apprentices, IF we decide we are In fact going through with the idea...
Please Log in to join the conversation.
JLSpinner wrote: I like the idea of 2 year terms staggering half of the group each year. Of course how do we decide who is in which group?
For at least this first one, what about the top two voted gets the longer term?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
steamboat28 wrote: Can I be "that guy" and ask that the Apprentice position be voted on by mostly, if not only, apprentices? If they're going to have an official advisory voice, I'd love for them to be able to choose it themselves.
I have to admit, if the knights are going to have the primary input on the knight appointees, it would be nice for the apprentices to have the primary input on the apprentice appointee, if it ends up being that there's going to be one.
Studies Journal | Personal Journal
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Kit wrote:
JLSpinner wrote: I like the idea of 2 year terms staggering half of the group each year. Of course how do we decide who is in which group?
For at least this first one, what about the top two voted gets the longer term?
That's simple, logical, and best portrays the voice of the voters. Good stuff!
Please Log in to join the conversation.