I Am What I AM...

OK, Rickie...you kinda lost me on that one...

(not in that "I don't believe you" way, but in that "I don't understand you" way )

Alluvius wrote: OK, Rickie...you kinda lost me on that one...

(not in that "I don't believe you" way, but in that "I don't understand you" way )

The ? or the crud.

I still haven't figured out "Tautological".

A phrase or expression in which the same thing is said twice in different words.

Also; he referenced accepting being a victim in the first post.

"A phrase or expression in which the same thing is said twice in different words. "

Where do I do that?

"Also; he referenced accepting being a victim in the first post."

If you pick up the intent of my entire post I think you'd see I am not claiming to be a victem. Being a victem is a choice.

Of course if one identifies with darkness then you would naturallly see weakness. I recognize my darkness but choose light and strength.

I am what I am. It's a tautology, no?

If I'm not pleased with my current status I can't blame circumstances, events or some other outside source. I can stew in my own juices or do something about it. I can accept being a victim or fight.

My post was more or less a response to yours. The next one in a chain of reflection. It wasn't directed at you, or aimed at anyone. In fact, I do agree with you. As my master says; "things aren't done without doing."

Gotchya. It was such a big word for me.

No problem, Rickie. It's one of my favourite unnecessary words. ^^