The Gender Unicorn

Physically attracted to and emotionally attracted to are missing 'all of the above' and 'none of the above' options.

It's a little reductive (over-simplified) but it isn't bogus either. It is showing merely that four areas that we generally lump together - and thence confuse - are four different, yet related, phenomena.

It doesn't show the "none of/all of the above" just like it doesn't show the overlap. But then, it is a graphic just exposing that these areas are different ... It isn't a master's thesis ...

Didn't say it was bogus

But without them, misses out people like asexuals and us 'don't have any preference' people

The arrows could be sliding scales.

---

It is to be filled in by hand indeed Akkarin. Below on the same page you can find an example.

Example from the website :
_{transstudent.org: ,,Example of how to fill out your own Gender Unicorn:''}

Well that makes a lot more sense!

I tried filling it in myself but actually found it too simplistic... it was quite difficult to express how I view my gender, and the 'physically attracted to' section actually didn't make sense to me when I tried to complete it.

It probably is easier to complete if you have a more 'rigid' definition of your own gender, and who you're attracted to.

I'm an 'anything goes' kind of person in both identity, expression, and who I'm attracted to So in the end I did this...

This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen (and I've watched Alex Jones shows lol).

It's like they are inventing new ways to confuse kids and over-complicate a pretty simple subject.

It may not be simple to everybody, though. And, having a way to navigate their own confusion, instead of trying to stuff it down in conformity, that's helpful for some.

Chandler Bing wrote: Penis, schmenis, we're all people