Nimrod Socialism

At the risk of sounding somewhat condescending, briefly... HW, do you understand that there is something like a difference between movies and the real world around us? I understand that Campbell doesn't much to emphasize that, but there is a case to be made that there is use in making this distinction, be it ever so fuzzy...

Gisteron wrote: At the risk of sounding somewhat condescending, briefly... HW, do you understand that there is something like a difference between movies and the real world around us? I understand that Campbell doesn't much to emphasize that, but there is a case to be made that there is use in making this distinction, be it ever so fuzzy...

I think cloudy is a better description than fuzzy. I think that George Lucas believes that the destruction of Tiamat or Phaeton or the Fifth planet formed the asteroid belt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_planet_(hypothetical)



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Kepler

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_belt

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGp_5gOww0E

Can we all just take a minute to appreciate this thread has gone on for 1 3/4 years so far?

Anyone can type words without research for that long.

However, I would like to thank whomever moved these posts to the correct thread.

Heavenly Warrior wrote:

Gisteron wrote: At the risk of sounding somewhat condescending, briefly... HW, do you understand that there is something like a difference between movies and the real world around us? I understand that Campbell doesn't much to emphasize that, but there is a case to be made that there is use in making this distinction, be it ever so fuzzy...

I think cloudy is a better description than fuzzy. I think that George Lucas believes that the destruction of Tiamat or Phaeton or the Fifth planet formed the asteroid belt.

First of all, who cares what you believe George Lucas believes? Second of all, who cares what George Lucas believes? Third of all, what does this have to do with the query you quoted and are presumably responding to?

Gisteron wrote:

Heavenly Warrior wrote:

Gisteron wrote: At the risk of sounding somewhat condescending, briefly... HW, do you understand that there is something like a difference between movies and the real world around us? I understand that Campbell doesn't much to emphasize that, but there is a case to be made that there is use in making this distinction, be it ever so fuzzy...

I think cloudy is a better description than fuzzy. I think that George Lucas believes that the destruction of Tiamat or Phaeton or the Fifth planet formed the asteroid belt.

First of all, who cares what you believe George Lucas believes? Second of all, who cares what George Lucas believes? Third of all, what does this have to do with the query you quoted and are presumably responding to?

I understand that Tiamat might have been destroyed by the Death Star. I understand that most myths might have originated with Sumerian and Akkadian Myths. I understand that the Nibirians might have came to Earth for two reasons. Have you read the Enuma Elis?

Heavenly Warrior wrote:

Gisteron wrote:

Heavenly Warrior wrote:

Gisteron wrote: At the risk of sounding somewhat condescending, briefly... HW, do you understand that there is something like a difference between movies and the real world around us? I understand that Campbell doesn't much to emphasize that, but there is a case to be made that there is use in making this distinction, be it ever so fuzzy...

I think cloudy is a better description than fuzzy. I think that George Lucas believes that the destruction of Tiamat or Phaeton or the Fifth planet formed the asteroid belt.

First of all, who cares what you believe George Lucas believes? Second of all, who cares what George Lucas believes? Third of all, what does this have to do with the query you quoted and are presumably responding to?

I understand that Tiamat might have been destroyed by the Death Star. I understand that most myths might have originated with Sumerian and Akkadian Myths. I understand that the Nibirians might have came to Earth for two reasons. Have you read the Enuma Elis?

Have you read the post you quote to respond to?

Gisteron wrote:

Heavenly Warrior wrote:

Gisteron wrote:

Heavenly Warrior wrote:

Gisteron wrote: At the risk of sounding somewhat condescending, briefly... HW, do you understand that there is something like a difference between movies and the real world around us? I understand that Campbell doesn't much to emphasize that, but there is a case to be made that there is use in making this distinction, be it ever so fuzzy...

I think cloudy is a better description than fuzzy. I think that George Lucas believes that the destruction of Tiamat or Phaeton or the Fifth planet formed the asteroid belt.

First of all, who cares what you believe George Lucas believes? Second of all, who cares what George Lucas believes? Third of all, what does this have to do with the query you quoted and are presumably responding to?

I understand that Tiamat might have been destroyed by the Death Star. I understand that most myths might have originated with Sumerian and Akkadian Myths. I understand that the Nibirians might have came to Earth for two reasons. Have you read the Enuma Elis?

Have you read the post you quote to respond to?

I have read the post I quote to respond to. I understand that Count Dooku is a fictional character and Count Dracula was a real person.

http://dracula.wikia.com/wiki/Christopher_Lee

I understand that Midi-Chlorians are fictional and Midichloria are real.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midichloria

I understand that the Death Star is fictional and Nemesis is hypothetical.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesis_(hypothetical_star)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfWqvBW7GHM

Wow... just wow... I remember when this thread started and I feel slightly dumber for reading as much of it that I have...

Heavenly Warrior wrote: I understand that Midi-Chlorians are fictional and Midichloria are real.

Yea but, midichloria were named afterwards so they don't count

I actually use the term myself to denote that healthy human microbiota, most notably living in the gut and perhaps even recently signs they might exist within the blood brain barrier and have direct interaction with the brain. The gut biota already has some good evidence pointing to their role to the immune system directly and indirectly to the brain, among other things. So for me, midichlorians are the healthy microorganisms living within us. There is even an emerging field of psychobiotics to this end....to give oneself a bump in the Force :silly:

psychobiotics were created by the Illuminati to introduce trauma into the blood brain barrier and create a perfectly undetectable mind controlled individual. When the mind and emotions are put under extreme stress they "break" and create a new mental-emotional state. It is within these mental states - born of trauma - that the mind can be conditioned. That someone would do this intentionally is unthinkable yet it is being done and confirmed by the necessarily true statements of the internet. Which is another plot of misinformation the Illuminati have perpetrated. its actually impossible to put a false statement on the internet but the Illuminati have spread the lie that it is possible to fool us all into compliance and to buy their psychobiotics.

Wow. If memory serves, this is a thread in which I participated in its early days. If I'm recalling correctly, in that time at least part of the discussion was actually about socialism. After being away, I am amazed to find that the focus of recent posts includes psychobiotics, Nibiru, the difference between mitochondria and mitochorians, the Hubble Space Telescope, Jeb Bush, and a pooplord.

I think this disproves Godwin's Law: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches 1." If ever a conversation was going to do that, I'd think it'd be this one.

This may be the weirdest reading I have ever encountered. And I am someone who spends the vast majority of my waking hours in YouTube and random internet sites.

Nah that is what they want you to think. Psychobiotics give you back control of your own mind. I have psychobiotics every morning with my cereal!!! They surround us and penetrate us, binding the galaxy together, since time immemorial. Break out of that consensual hallucination called 'normality', and take back your minds from the mainstream :silly:

So if I understand what people are saying (which I don’t but I’m going to make an uneducated hypothetical guess anyway, because that is the basis of this mind boggling thread) midichlorians exist in our bodies to control our minds by the Illuminati and the only Force they awaken is gas (which can still clear rooms like a movie Jedi, just sometimes less pushing) and this gas is what caused the conspiracy for 9/11 which is what the Illuminati wanted for bio-chemical war that is all based on the Judeo-Christian God’s plan. Did I miss anything?

Yes this whole master plan came from the planet Nibiru that was destroyed and is now an asteroid field between mars and the outer rim. The plan was known as plan 9 from outer space, but has been put on hold while the Nubiruns move to planet P outside our solar system. Planet P is an ugly planet, a bug planet!!!

Oh. I must have missed that back in the teens somewhere. That’s for catching me up though!

Kyrin Wyldstar wrote: Yes this whole master plan came from the planet Nibiru that was destroyed and is now an asteroid field between mars and the outer rim. The plan was known as plan 9 from outer space, but has been put on hold while the Nubiruns move to planet P outside our solar system. Planet P is an ugly planet, a bug planet!!!

Tiamat might have been destroyed by one of Nibiru's moons. Nibiru's Dyson sphere might have been damaged when it collided with Tiamat or Uranus. They needed gold to fix their Dyson sphere. I don't know why they bent Uranus over, maybe Phaethon was steering.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCO8Kdun3JQ

Omhu Cuspor wrote: Wow. If memory serves, this is a thread in which I participated in its early days. If I'm recalling correctly, in that time at least part of the discussion was actually about socialism. After being away, I am amazed to find that the focus of recent posts includes psychobiotics, Nibiru, the difference between mitochondria and mitochorians, the Hubble Space Telescope, Jeb Bush, and a pooplord.

I think this disproves Godwin's Law: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches 1." If ever a conversation was going to do that, I'd think it'd be this one.

Dawn and Kepler ran out of gas. That sounds like a plot of a bad movie.

The founding father of leftism was Rousseau, his puppet was Robespierre. The founding father of socialism was Voltaire, his puppet was Bonaparte. The founding father of nationalism was Schopenhauer, his puppet was the Kaiser. The founding father of globalism was William Huntington Russell, his puppet was John Brown. The founding father of national socialism was Wagner. The founding father of national eugenics was Sir Francis Galton. The founding father of global eugenics was Charles Davenport. The founding fathers of fascism, national fascism, and global fascism were Erasmus Darwin, Charles Darwin, and Dawkins.

So that makes you the founding father of... ?