Doctrine proposal on defining the force .
Please only vote once per person !
=_= Malicious (+_+)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- steamboat28
-
- Offline
- Knight
- Ordained Clergy
Have I pushed for a working definition often in the past? Yes, but only at the org level, leaving everyone's personal interpretation up to the individual. Are there more important matters here? You bet.
A.Div
IP | Apprentice | Seminary | Degree
AMA | Vlog | Meditation
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I have noticed something about your approach to everything. You complain a lot but never provide alternatives or solutions. You have done this with me and I have had to force things out of you. Now I'm seeing you do it to others.
If you want change, you have to be that change and you have to follow through. That is the real work. What you are doing here is not real work, it's just whining that everyone but you is messed up. But guess what, it's not everyone else... it's you my friend.
Where ever you go, there you are. Make the best of it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- steamboat28
-
- Offline
- Knight
- Ordained Clergy
Fyxe wrote: What you are doing here is not real work, it's just whining that everyone but you is messed up. But guess what, it's not everyone else... it's you my friend.
I'll let the rest of the Temple speak for whatever work they think I have or haven't done over the eleven years my account has been active here. Many of them will agree with you. Many may not.
The truth of the matter is that you aren't unlike me at all. We're very similar; during the earliest phases of my journey here, I was incendiary. I jumped to conclusions. I fought everyone for literally no good reason. I crowed loud and long, and railed against anyone who disagreed with me.
Just.
Like.
You.
So, knowing that, you have a choice ahead of you. You can learn the hard way, like I did, and waste years here trying to convince everyone of how wrong they are.
Or, you can listen more intently to what people are saying instead of arguing with what you assume they're saying.
The choice is yours.
A.Div
IP | Apprentice | Seminary | Degree
AMA | Vlog | Meditation
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Where ever you go, there you are. Make the best of it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
from dē + fīniō (“set a limit, bound, end”)
Seems unusual to set limits on something defined as so limitless.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
=_= Malicious (+_+)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- steamboat28
-
- Offline
- Knight
- Ordained Clergy
A.Div
IP | Apprentice | Seminary | Degree
AMA | Vlog | Meditation
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
steamboat28 wrote: You have a point, Malicious. I'll stay out of your discussions in the future and let you young pups work it all out for yourselves.
That is not what I was getting at I like when you comment in no way was I meaning for you not to comment on my discussions I was just trying to say that i have seen you and fyxe arguing in other post and it got a little heated . You have every right to comment and I am not trying to make you not to but I am asking that you and fyxe refrain from arguing , you may comment but all I ask is that you try not to argue .
=_= Malicious (+_+)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Leah Starspectre
-
- Offline
- Apprentice
- Posts: 1221

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
General Forum
-
Open Discussions
- Doctrine proposal on defining the force .