- Posts: 2014
Dark Matter Apparently is Midichlorians
discussions don't benefit until logical explanations are provided
Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using Tapatalk
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Better to leave questions unanswered than answers unquestioned
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
The Force probably is in the Dark Matter, because the Force is everywhere, it's the very fabric of the universe and of our bodies and everything else.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- OB1Shinobi
- Offline
- Banned
- Posts: 4394
Entropist wrote: leave the Force undefined? serious? does the code mention knowledge?
Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using Tapatalk
how do YOU define the force?
People are complicated.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Or to better sum up, everything about dark matter we know now is simply theory still, there's no way to really know if we're right or not so we must keep an open mind to the possibilities, and always assume we don't yet know all the information, all the perspectives, and make the best judgments, but also not be quick to make such judgments, based on that knowledge.
-Simply Jedi
"Do or Do Not, There is No Talk!" -Me
Tellahane's Initiate Journal
Tellahane's Apprenticeship Journal
Tellahane's Holocron Document
Tellahane's Knight Journal
Tellahane's Degree Journal
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Citation, please...Tellahane wrote: The code also talks about wisdom...
First, you said that we have run every scenario possible, so the possibility you are referring to is - by your own admission - impossible. However, math is not a science. It is not based on scenarios or observations, but solely on internal consistency. Therefore 1 + 1 = 2 is true under very specific meanings of "1", "2", the "=" relation and the "+" operator, respectively. That is not a matter of discovery, it is a matter of definition.... there is the possibility that down the road we might actually find out that 1+1 does not actually = 2.
On the other hand, physics is a science, so eventhough that analogy is analogous in just about no way, the point you are trying to make might still be valid.
Theory is as far as it goes. The real thing is the real thing. Theory is what we know about it. Not what we speculate or can imagine or can assert, but what we actually know.Or to better sum up, everything about dark matter we know now is simply theory still...
Depends on what you mean by "right". And science doesn't care about being right.... there's no way to really know if we're right or not...
One of the inherent problems with omniscience is that an omniscient being would be unable to tell whether they are in fact omniscient. Scale that down to just one topic and obviously you end up with a scenario that at every point we have no way of telling whether there is still more to know about that topic or not. Assume nothing. Question everything. Research doesn't start with the assumption that we are missing something when everything is working out; rather it starts with a problem - whenever something does not quite work. It is in that case that either our equipment or our understanding failed and it is only by eliminating the former that we can conclude - not assume - the latter.... so we must keep an open mind to the possibilities, and always assume we don't yet know all the information, all the perspectives, and make the best judgments, but also not be quick to make such judgments, based on that knowledge.
Oh, and there multiple ways to understand what is "possible". Not everything that is logically possible is physically possible and not everything that is physically possible is by any means probable and not everything that is probable is or ever has been actually the case. The open mind is the critical mind: The one that filters propositions, not the one that just accepts them all, indiscriminately.
Better to leave questions unanswered than answers unquestioned
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Gisteron wrote:
Citation, please...Tellahane wrote: The code also talks about wisdom...
First, you said that we have run every scenario possible, so the possibility you are referring to is - by your own admission - impossible. However, math is not a science. It is not based on scenarios or observations, but solely on internal consistency. Therefore 1 + 1 = 2 is true under very specific meanings of "1", "2", the "=" relation and the "+" operator, respectively. That is not a matter of discovery, it is a matter of definition.... there is the possibility that down the road we might actually find out that 1+1 does not actually = 2.
On the other hand, physics is a science, so eventhough that analogy is analogous in just about no way, the point you are trying to make might still be valid.
Theory is as far as it goes. The real thing is the real thing. Theory is what we know about it. Not what we speculate or can imagine or can assert, but what we actually know.Or to better sum up, everything about dark matter we know now is simply theory still...
Depends on what you mean by "right". And science doesn't care about being right.... there's no way to really know if we're right or not...
One of the inherent problems with omniscience is that an omniscient being would be unable to tell whether they are in fact omniscient. Scale that down to just one topic and obviously you end up with a scenario that at every point we have no way of telling whether there is still more to know about that topic or not. Assume nothing. Question everything. Research doesn't start with the assumption that we are missing something when everything is working out; rather it starts with a problem - whenever something does not quite work. It is in that case that either our equipment or our understanding failed and it is only by eliminating the former that we can conclude - not assume - the latter.... so we must keep an open mind to the possibilities, and always assume we don't yet know all the information, all the perspectives, and make the best judgments, but also not be quick to make such judgments, based on that knowledge.
Oh, and there multiple ways to understand what is "possible". Not everything that is logically possible is physically possible and not everything that is physically possible is by any means probable and not everything that is probable is or ever has been actually the case. The open mind is the critical mind: The one that filters propositions, not the one that just accepts them all, indiscriminately.
Ok got me on the code, quote the tenants then, or use any of the other many codes out there such as grey jedi code if you wish, citation aside...
always keeping an open mind to possibilities that we don't yet know exist is something I'll stick by on a personal level as its served me very well, on a side note, had nothing better to do today gist?
-Simply Jedi
"Do or Do Not, There is No Talk!" -Me
Tellahane's Initiate Journal
Tellahane's Apprenticeship Journal
Tellahane's Holocron Document
Tellahane's Knight Journal
Tellahane's Degree Journal
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Better to leave questions unanswered than answers unquestioned
Please Log in to join the conversation.