"Terry Kupers defines toxic masculinity as "the constellation of socially regressive male traits that serve to foster domination, the devaluation of women, homophobia and wanton violence".
Kupers seems to enjoy using scientific sounding words but does he offer anything remotely close to scientific defense of his conclusions that these traits are actually male-specific? Do females not engage in power struggles, homophobia, or violence? What precisely IS "wanton violence" and what measurements does he use to distinguish male vs female engagement in it or support of it?
According to Kupers, toxic masculinity serves to outline aspects of hegemonic masculinity that are socially destructive,
"Socially Destructive" is a label he uses (im betting) without actually qualifying. Give me a precise definition of "socially destructive" and, dollars to doughnuts, unless you include the word "male" into definition itself, the term will also be applicable to behaviors within female populations, including those behaviors meant to assert personal superiority and to impose some form of social hegemony.
And I would add that it is highly debatable the degree to which imposing hegemony is "socially destructive". In many cases it could equally be argued to be "socially corrective". Culture is based on shared experience, so some degree of hegemony is necessary or else the culture fragments irreparably.
Toxic masculine norms are a feature of life for men in American prisons, where they are reflected in the behaviour of both staff and inmates.
Prison is a very different world. Prison culture is not relevant for drawing conclusions about free world culture.
But again, does he actually make an in depth investigation of life in women's prisons in order to compare?
Bullying of boys by their peers and domestic violence experienced by boys at home can also be expressions of toxic masculinity.
Except that girls also bully other girls and women also abuse their partners and their children, suggesting that bullying and abuse are not gender specific.
The often violent socialization of boys produces psychological trauma through the promotion of aggression and lack of intimate relations with others.
Again, neither the experience of being traumatized nor the tendency to cause some kind of psychological trauma can actually be demonstrated as gender specific.
Such trauma is often disregarded, such as in the saying "boys will be boys" with regard to bullying.
I swear to Christ the only people ive ever heard say this (in a non-ironic way) were SJW types trying to sell me on "toxic masculinity"
Topic Author
